This post was meant to be my last on the topic of the Federal Reserve (Fed) buying ETFs as part of a range of measures to support the markets. Very simply, I wanted to summarize my main issue with the Fed’s announcement—only to find out that the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility now includes an update! Now, ETFs whose investment objective is exposure to US high-yield bonds will also be included along with investment-grade bonds.
As I wrote in my last blog post, the largest ETFs that provide exposure to investment-grade bonds saw an immediate influx of assets. Updating those stats through April 8, those funds have received inflows of over $8.5 billion, which equates to an annual revenue run rate—an expectation of annual revenue extrapolated over a year—of almost $13 million.1 And given the Fed’s most recent announcement, it will not surprise me if we see similar numbers for high-yield ETFs as well.
For those who have been reading this blog since I first started putting pen to paper, it should be obvious by now that getting a new fund to scale is quite the challenge. At the top of the list as to why is related to the new fund’s counting stats (size, volume and spread), which will almost certainly be worse than the incumbent to which it is compared. However, the good news—and one of the main reasons Franklin Templeton was the fastest-growing ETF issuer in the United States in 20192—is that investors are now taking the time to better understand ETF trading and the misconceptions associated with those counting stats. To recap:
The bid/ask spread does not tell the whole story about an ETF’s round trip trading cost.
Volume is not an accurate gauge of liquidity (just like terrific new restaurants may go unnoticed for a while).
Assets under management are also not an accurate gauge of liquidity.
A Level Playing Field?
Back to the Fed announcement. We applaud the Fed including ETFs in the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility, given how fixed income ETFs have become the investment vehicle of choice for so many. Unfortunately, by not specifying the exact ETFs to be included, the public had no choice but to assume that the typical ETF counting stats would be used.
The end result: $13 million of additional annual revenue to the largest ETF issuers. Some nuance would have been nice to see here given all the steps the Securities and Exchange Commission took to create a level playing field within the ETF space, including the explicit validation that active and passive ETFs are operationally no different.
Important Legal Information
This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice.
Any companies and case studies shown herein are used solely for illustrative purposes; any investment may or may not be currently held by any portfolio advised by Franklin Templeton. The opinions are intended solely to provide insight into how securities are analyzed. The information provided is not a recommendation or individual investment advice for any particular security, strategy, or investment product and is not an indication of the trading intent of any Franklin Templeton managed portfolio. This is not a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any industry, security or investment and should not be viewed as an investment recommendation. This is intended to provide insight into the portfolio selection and research process. Factual statements are taken from sources considered reliable but have not been independently verified for completeness or accuracy. These opinions may not be relied upon as investment advice or as an offer for any particular security. Past performance is not an indicator or a guarantee of future results.
The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as of publication date and may change without notice. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market.
Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.
Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own professional adviser or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.
Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc., One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com—Franklin Templeton Distributors, Inc. is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton’s U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.
This information is intended for US residents only.
What Are the Risks?
All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal. Generally, those offering potential for higher returns are accompanied by a higher degree of risk. Stock prices fluctuate, sometimes rapidly and dramatically, due to factors affecting individual companies, particular industries or sectors, or general market conditions. For actively managed ETFs, there is no guarantee that the manager’s investment decisions will produce the desired results.
ETFs trade like stocks, fluctuate in market value and may trade above or below the ETF’s net asset value. Brokerage commissions and ETF expenses will reduce returns. ETF shares may be bought or sold throughout the day at their market price on the exchange on which they are listed. However, there can be no guarantee that an active trading market for ETF shares will be developed or maintained or that their listing will continue or remain unchanged. While the shares of ETFs are tradable on secondary markets, they may not readily trade in all market conditions and may trade at significant discounts in periods of market stress.
For more information on any of our funds, contact your financial advisor or download a free prospectus. Investors should carefully consider a fund’s investment goals, risks, sales charges and expenses before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing or sending money.
To get insights from Franklin Templeton delivered to your inbox, subscribe to the Beyond Bulls & Bears blog.
1. Source: Bloomberg. There is no assurance that any estimate, forecast or projection will be realized.
2. Source: Bloomberg. Based on percentage growth for ETF issuers who ended 2018 with over $500 million of assets.