Beyond Bulls & Bears

Wealth Planning

Five observations on the expiration of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

The TCJA is set to expire at the end of 2025, bringing unprecedented uncertainty. From potential tax rate hikes to changes in deductions, our Bill Cass highlights what you need to know to plan ahead.

The uncertainty around the upcoming presidential election, combined with the pending expiration of most individual tax provisions, creates a unique challenge for taxpayers.

Unless Congress acts, the TCJA will expire at the end of 2025. While there’s always some aspect of uncertainty associated with the tax code, this level of uncertainty may be unprecedented.

How can effective planning be done in this type of environment? Depending on individual circumstances, there may be ways to hedge the risk of potential tax changes or to create flexibility in plans depending on legislative action. For these reasons, we’ve seen increased interest in strategies such as Roth IRA conversions (to hedge the risk of higher income taxes) and Spousal Lifetime Access Trusts (to take advantage of the current lifetime estate tax exclusion before it is potentially reduced). Some wealthy families are creating irrevocable trusts now, but not fully funding those trusts, in anticipation of potential changes depending on the results of the election.

Individuals will want to seek professional guidance on what type of action should be considered in this uncertain tax environment.

Five observations around the expiration of the TCJA

1. A closer look at the scheduled changes to income tax rates and brackets

While there is a lot of discussion around the top tax rate on ordinary income increasing from 37% to 39.6%, there is much more to the story. Meaning, there are scheduled increases throughout the various tax brackets that need to be considered.

For example:

    • The second-lowest marginal tax bracket increases from 12% to 15%. For 2024, this includes taxpayers with taxable income between $11,600 and $47,150 for single filers and between $23,400 and $94,300 for married couples filing a joint tax return. One question is, will Congress be motivated to avoid a full expiration of the TCJA to prevent a tax hike on lower- and middle-income taxpayers?
    • There are some income levels where the potential increase in the marginal tax rate is dramatic. For example, some married couples currently subject to a 24% marginal tax rate may see their rate increase to 33% on a portion of their income, an increase of nine percentage points.

2. The outlook on tax deductions is mixed

Some good news in the event the TCJA fully expires is that certain deductions not allowed or limited will be available to taxpayers. For example, miscellaneous deductions will be available again and the current $10,000 cap on deducting state and local taxes (SALT) would be repealed.

However, the standard deduction ($14,600 for single filers, $29,200 for married couples filing a joint tax return) will essentially be cut in half.

Currently, only 10% of taxpayers itemize deductions on their return compared to roughly 30% prior to the TCJA, according to the Tax Policy Center. If the TCJA expires, the number of taxpayers itemizing deductions would increase. In particular, as we head toward 2025, the debate in Congress on relaxing the $10,000 cap on deducting SALT will be interesting to follow since support is generally limited to lawmakers in higher-taxed states, and those who would generally benefit by removing the cap tend to be higher-income households.

3. Higher-wealth households need to carefully consider next steps

While very few estates owe federal estate tax, the number will roughly double in 2026 (from 4,000 to nearly 9,000), according to the Tax Policy Center. The lifetime exclusion amount is scheduled to be reduced in half after 2025 (from over $13 million currently to roughly $7 million per individual). Some higher-wealth households are taking action now by gifting assets to irrevocable trusts.

However, careful consideration must be given in the event the exclusion figure is not reduced after 2025, rendering some of this estate planning unnecessary and potentially detrimental, such as a loss of control over those assets. Also, gifts into irrevocable trust generally do not benefit from step-up in cost basis at death.1 For example, at the end of 2012, the lifetime exclusion amount was scheduled to decrease from over $5 million to $1 million. However, due to bipartisan legislation (the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012), the exclusion figure remained the same and eventually was doubled by the TCJA effective beginning in 2018.

4. Will the alternative minimum tax (AMT) come back in full force?

The TCJA made modifications that significantly reduced the number of taxpayers owing the alternative minimum tax (AMT) and made the tax filing process simpler for many taxpayers. Currently, the AMT impacts roughly 200,000 taxpayers annually, but that number is estimated to increase to more than seven million taxpayers upon expiration of the TCJA.2 Will Congress take steps to avoid this drastic expansion of the AMT after 2025?

5. Certain business owners may face a significant tax hike

Most business owners are not taxed as separate entities subject to the corporate tax rate of 21% (which is NOT scheduled to expire after 2025). Instead, these businesses are considered “pass-through entities” subject to individual tax rates and brackets. Many businesses are eligible for a 20% tax deduction for qualified business income (QBI). (See IRS for more details on QBI).

For example, a small business owner today subject to the maximum 37% tax rate may be able to take a 20% QBI deduction reducing their effective tax rate on business income to roughly 30%. Since the QBI deduction is scheduled to expire after 2025, that same business owner would not only lose that 20% deduction, but also be subject to a 39.6% tax rate as the top tax rate on ordinary income increases from 37% to 39.6%. Will there be pressure on Congress to take action to avoid a situation where certain businesses (many small businesses in particular) face a significant tax hike while corporations subject to the 21% corporate tax rate do not?

For more details about the impact of the expiration of the TCJA, see “Looking ahead to the expiration of the TCJA.”

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Any information, statement or opinion set forth herein is general in nature, is not directed to or based on the financial situation or needs of any particular investor, and does not constitute, and should not be construed as, investment advice, forecast of future events, a guarantee of future results, or a recommendation with respect to any particular security or investment strategy or type of retirement account. Investors seeking financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any securities or investment strategies should consult their financial professional.

Franklin Templeton, its affiliated companies, and its employees are not in the business of providing tax or legal advice to taxpayers. These materials and any tax-related statements are not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used or relied upon, by any such taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties or complying with any applicable tax laws or regulations. Tax-related statements, if any, may have been written in connection with the “promotion or marketing” of the transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed by these materials, to the extent allowed by applicable law. Any such taxpayer should seek advice based on the taxpayer’s particular circumstances from an independent tax advisor.

IMPORTANT LEGAL INFORMATION

This material is intended to be of general interest only and should not be construed as individual investment advice or a recommendation or solicitation to buy, sell or hold any security or to adopt any investment strategy. It does not constitute legal or tax advice. This material may not be reproduced, distributed or published without prior written permission from Franklin Templeton.

The views expressed are those of the investment manager and the comments, opinions and analyses are rendered as at publication date and may change without notice. The underlying assumptions and these views are subject to change based on market and other conditions and may differ from other portfolio managers or of the firm as a whole. The information provided in this material is not intended as a complete analysis of every material fact regarding any country, region or market. There is no assurance that any prediction, projection or forecast on the economy, stock market, bond market or the economic trends of the markets will be realized. The value of investments and the income from them can go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount that you invested. Past performance is not necessarily indicative nor a guarantee of future performance. All investments involve risks, including possible loss of principal.

Any research and analysis contained in this material has been procured by Franklin Templeton for its own purposes and may be acted upon in that connection and, as such, is provided to you incidentally. Data from third party sources may have been used in the preparation of this material and Franklin Templeton (“FT”) has not independently verified, validated or audited such data. Although information has been obtained from sources that Franklin Templeton believes to be reliable, no guarantee can be given as to its accuracy and such information may be incomplete or condensed and may be subject to change at any time without notice. The mention of any individual securities should neither constitute nor be construed as a recommendation to purchase, hold or sell any securities, and the information provided regarding such individual securities (if any) is not a sufficient basis upon which to make an investment decision. FT accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss arising from use of this information and reliance upon the comments, opinions and analyses in the material is at the sole discretion of the user.

Products, services and information may not be available in all jurisdictions and are offered outside the U.S. by other FT affiliates and/or their distributors as local laws and regulation permits. Please consult your own financial professional or Franklin Templeton institutional contact for further information on availability of products and services in your jurisdiction.

Issued in the U.S. by Franklin Distributors, LLC, One Franklin Parkway, San Mateo, California 94403-1906, (800) DIAL BEN/342-5236, franklintempleton.com – Franklin Distributors, LLC, member FINRA/SIPC, is the principal distributor of Franklin Templeton U.S. registered products, which are not FDIC insured; may lose value; and are not bank guaranteed and are available only in jurisdictions where an offer or solicitation of such products is permitted under applicable laws and regulation.

Please visit www.franklinresources.com to be directed to your local Franklin Templeton website.

__________________________

1. Note: Some trusts may include language that allows swapping or substitution powers under IRC Section 675(4)(C) which may mitigate the risk of losing step-up on cost basis on appreciated assets held within an irrevocable trust.

2, Congressional Budget Office. As of 2024.

Get Content Alerts in My Inbox

Receive email alerts when a new blog is posted.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *